

The pharmacy no, the pharmacists absolutely, they’ll just lose their job.
This bill is about the individual, so it doesn’t really change anything in this example.


The pharmacy no, the pharmacists absolutely, they’ll just lose their job.
This bill is about the individual, so it doesn’t really change anything in this example.


Nothing stops that pharmacist from doing that though, its a company policy that would allow or prevent it.
If the company policy is they can’t refuse then they can refuse and lose their job.
For a small owner run business it could be different though like we wont make you a wedding cake.


How the fuck am I supposed to play my game of is it a republican or democrat when they put it in the title?
I do pretty good in the game always guessing the same thing.


I know I can get it, I just can’t be bothered and don’t want to spend the money.


Glad they were able to help sort you out there, that could have been a disaster.


Oh man i could just imagine going to replace my birth certificate because its damaged, and when they ask to prove my identity, say it’s not valid because of damage and then deport me on the spot.


I’m a Canadian so I don’t have to put up with this… but I don’t think I could legally prove citizenship on the spot though.
I do have a birth certificate, but it’s damaged, and would be considered invalid. It would cost me money to replace.


So now that these names are named, wouldn’t it be easier to sue to government for illegally redacting them as they weren’t legitimate names to be redacted?
It’s harder when you don’t have the names.
Not that anything will happen even if it does… but in a sane world, it would right?
A little deportation without due process might be in order as well.


RFK Jr’s numbers are less immediate, the long term impact can be immense though.


Is it at least ICE water?
Sorry, couldn’t resist.


Texas has runoffs? How the fuck did that ever get passed there.


Ya, the more videos that come out the worse and worse this is getting.
The first video I saw, I only heard 3 shots. I was shocked when more videos came out and it was way more than that. Like wtf.


Clearly once the gun was removed from the altercation, it was now safe to kill him. What if they accidentally shot the gun and it caused the shot to ricochet or they hit the ammo clip and caused those to ignite/fire.
Finding and removing the gun made it safe to proceed.


The CNN video shows them disarming him and it not being in the beating area when the murder happens
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid
That picture might not be that gun, but there is proof they should have a gun in their possession.


New Memo Dated Sunday Jan 25th.
We disagree with the judges ruling, and still think our administrative warrants allow us to enter a house. Carry on.
Yes, I was saying that they can and still do what they want, but can/will still face punishment if they decide to do it because individuality has no place in a company setting. Its the company rules that will dictate if they can or can’t do something, and those company rules may also be dictated by laws.
That pharmacist would (should) have faced punishment because it was at work.