Yup, same experience. I started out hosting everything on a single box, but have slowly moved things like HA and Pi-hole to their own machines, so they don’t all go down when that one box goes down.
Yup, same experience. I started out hosting everything on a single box, but have slowly moved things like HA and Pi-hole to their own machines, so they don’t all go down when that one box goes down.
Given your “it becomes like I drink water”, I think you have a serious problem.
They’re explaining that after getting that drunk, even drinking just water makes them puke. Not saying that they drink alcohol like it’s water.
Yeah, right up there with taking and refusing classified government documents.
Me too, but he would simply refuse.
deleted by creator
The problem is, not voting is as far as they’ll actually go towards “not participating in that system”. They still want all the benefits that they get from the system.
So it becomes less of a politically motivated action and more of just a tantrum.
Recently, I was arguing with one, and they unironically suggested we’d be in a better position now if Trump had won in 2020.
Which is to say, I think you need to have one first in order to lose it.
Better luck next time. If you’re going to be pedantic, at least be good at it.
I sad it protests did not cause his actions.
Again, the only way you can accurately make that claim is with the knowledge of what did cause it.
So prove your claim that the thing that caused this was not the protests, but something else instead.
What should have been said, was
Agreed. And what you should have said was “There’s no evidence that the protests caused his actions.” But you didn’t, you instead made a falsifiable claim, and refuse to back it up with proof. Making you a hypocrite.
I’m done with this discussion
Better luck next time, then.
The onus isn’t on me to “know what they meant.”
Of course not. And even if you want to pretend you were actually unclear on it, it was then explained to you several times. So whether or not its on you to know it is irrelevant. You did know it, and chose to continue your argument in bad faith from there on out.
If you claim something is proof of something, be prepared to prove it when asked, or don’t say it.
So change the word “proof” in the parent comment to “strong evidence”. Is it clear to you now? Do you understand?
Prove it
You can’t prove a negative
You aren’t claiming a negative.
Logically, it was caused by something. You are claiming that the something that caused it was not the protests.
The only way you can accurately make that claim is with the knowledge of what did cause it.
So prove your claim that the thing that caused this was not the protests, but something else instead.
If you don’t do that, you’re admitting to arguing in bad faith.
What’s actually bad faith is knowing what someone meant, but continuing to argue that a single word choice voids their sentiment.
So this whole time you’re simply being pedantic about the word “proof”?
That’s pretty pathetic.
don’t blame us if Israel flattens Rafah
Yeah, that’s literally the point. Biden is being blamed for the genocide up to now, so he’s literally saying not to blame him if they flatten Rafah.
Not sure why that’s supposed to be a gotcha…
What caused it?
biden won’t accept a trump win
Huh?
deleted by creator
As if he wouldn’t just refuse to do it
I keep seeing all these blue no matter who folks who can’t accept that anyone would ever critique Biden.
Bullshit. You can scroll up this thread and see that’s not the case.
What you’re seeing is people saying to vote blue while also criticizing Biden, because the alternative is so much worse.
You’re somehow conflating that with people not accepting any criticism of Biden.
I’m surprised beehaw hasn’t defederated from the tankie instance.