• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle

  • Urbanisation and deforestation are not the same as enshitification tho.

    It’s a bit unfortunate that “increased degree in which something is shit” sounds like what the word should mean, and I suppose it then sort of does.

    It’s nice to have a word that describes the investor-driven incentives to worsen a service/product to milk out more short-term revenue. The larger a market capture is, the more that can be pushed without an alternative being a threat.

    It’s the cycle of “provide a good quality service that makes everybody happy” -> market capture -> shareholders push for increase revenue at the expense of quality as there is no competition.









  • Here is a list of some practical uses so far:

    • Get a notification on the phone when the washer is done.
    • Charge the car when electricity is cheap
    • Turn on humidifier if sufficiently humid and no motion near it for a while
    • Automatically lock the front door at night
    • Toggle lights with a shortcut key on the keyboard
    • Change target thermostats for different rooms and different time of day.

    Also nice to learn about the house:

    • Breakdown of electricity usage. (How much actually goes to heating, car, etc)
    • Answer questions like “When did I really go to bed last night?”. Etc






  • This might come across a little bit insulting, and I mean it that way too if it hits home.

    You are putting way to much value into the creation of this word. It is the descriptive noun “shit” followed by the suffix “-ification”. It doesn’t need to be “coined” by anyone attributing any other meaning than what you would get by a descriptive noun, followed by “-ification”. Adding the prefix en- is a nice embellishment.

    So, perhaps the dude made it become a used word, but to presume a word’s origin defines it is a bit silly. That isn’t how language work. If enough people like a word, and like for it to mean something, then… that’s what that word means, because that’s what “meaning” means. Sometimes, it is exceedingly frustrating when it breaks with the original meaning, e.g. “literally” being used for “figurative”. In this case, it does not. So why would anyone give a shit if someone thinks a word should mean something else than what it literally means.



  • Nah. He called it that, but the word follows grammatical* structure well enough that it can be easily understood and used in a more general sense. “the gradual increase in which something is shit” = “enshitification”.

    Fits for what he wanted to use it for. Fits for a whole lot more. One cannot gatekeep language. Whatever is the most effective way to transfer a concept from one mind as to be similarly understood in someone else’s, ultimately is language.

    * maybe not grammar, but you get what I mean