Agreed it sucks. What do you want to do about it in the 2024 election?
Agreed it sucks. What do you want to do about it in the 2024 election?
And? These are the same people who roll coal to own the libs
Odd thing to request considering the conservatives in charge of Texas government deny that burning fossil fuels causes climate change.
The vast majority of people in the DFW area do not live on a dart line, and drive to commute
Depends on what you mean by matter. The point of the criminal justice system is, theoretically, to determine who breaks the law, and to punish people who break the law. In that sense it matters because Trump was found guilty in a fair trial by a jury of his peers.
If what you mean is that it will change the politics of America, certainly. Trump is now running with the specter of a conviction hanging over him. Even assuming appeals and pardons, that fundamentally changes the nature of the election. It raises real and serious questions about how he could serve if under house arrest, parole, or in prison. It forces us to reckon with the balance of powers in this country - can a person dodge justice because they attain high office, or do we hold them accountable no matter what?
If what you mean is in reality, no it probably won’t do shit.
And why do old people randomly capitalize nouns? Every Sentence reads like the just read the Written Word for the first time and wanted to give It a Try For Themselves
Yeah I don’t trust the good will of corporations, even the ones I personally like
Yeah GOG is a better ownership model. Steam is not ownership
I mean I hate to say it but if steam closed up shop tomorrow your games are gone too. You buy a license, not a copy, from steam
Efficiency is the real gay agenda
Well that’s because you’re a tech-hating Luddite most likely \s
Yeah since I learned who the Luddites were I’ve kind of fallen in love with them
God he’s so punchable
Kissing girls is the gayest, if they’ve kissed another dude you’re technically kissing those dudes too \s
Happy to! I can see why someone would be confused 😂
The Luddite is an anticapitalist blog https://theluddite.org
People here are far more likely to be anti-capitalist, anti-corporate, pro-privacy, etc. those groups all circle the same kind of Cory Doctorow/Matt Stoller/Luddite world where the word enshittification became popular.
The trick here is the NYT trying to convince us that regular GOP economic policy ISN’T quackery. It’s all bullshit. Always has been. Trump isn’t more bullshit than any of the other GOP bullshitters.
No, I can. I can point to the data in the article that shows that Manchin and west would benefit Trump when polled in 2023. I can point to data for progress showing that an “independent” candidate like Hogan would swing things for Trump. I can point to 2016 when fewer than 100k votes decided the election. I can use that to extrapolate out that the third party slate tends to benefit republicans. But my BROADER point is that you don’t actually give a shit, you could have googled this if you did, and you’ve been waiting for me to drop a name so you could determine precisely which bad faith, misguided, or incomplete argument against precisely that candidate you can pull out of your Rolodex of talking points.
So please get to your fucking point already because if it’s what you said in your comment then the answer was for you to READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE AND USE GOOGLE all along. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you were just a lazy troll who wanted me to say a name instead of reading a name in an article, but maybe it’s simpler than that: did you actually think I couldn’t name a third party candidate?
Can…can you not name one? Are you trying to get me to name one because you don’t know any? Is this a cry for help?
I don’t think that steals the headlines in a positive way.