Mets aren’t good enough? ::cries in Yankees:::

There’s two interesting things the article points out.

1. These were recontact polls. So these were people who were already polled, presumably a small percentage changing their minds.
2. These were multiple pills across different organizations running them. So while they can be within the margin of error, they all saw the same trend.

Obviously you can’t go by polls, and there’s a ton of time between now and Nov, but it’s interesting nonetheless.

To be fair, lots of them. Kennedy, Eisenhower, Nixon to name a few off the top of my head, but I’m sure there’s more I’m missing.

Or you know, at no point did you actually engage in discussion. You used a false equivalent and rhetoric. Which is pretty much the textbook definition of a bad faith argument.

Ahh I get it. So you’re 100% the person I was talking about in my first post.

As long as you understand that not voting for Biden is 100% a vote for Trump (whether you cast a ballot or not) and you’re OK with that, then more power to you.

But I would ask, what do you think you’re achieving by not voting for him? If you voted for him in 2020 then you must hold personal ideals that at least semi-align with his, and you have to know that Trump’s are a complete 180 from them.

I’d also like to ask (since you imply you haven’t made up your mind) what Biden could do to change your mind?

I suspect a lot of those people are arguing in bad faith and are actually spreading misinformation. That they never intended on voting for Biden, or always intended on voting for Trump and trying to make it seem like Biden is losing his base.

IRL, most people I know, while not happy with Biden’s response acknowledge that Trump’s view is much much worse.

It depends on which flag the terrorist is waving