• 0 Posts
  • 225 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 29th, 2023

help-circle

  • as an aussie that has a parliamentary system, and in that system has had a period where we frequently ousted the PM, it’s not that great of an idea

    you want governments to be able to plan for the long term. really, even 4y is not great for long term planning because it kinda implies you need to show results before the term is up

    we had a bunch of policy flip-flops during that period, which is very inefficient

    i guess it doesn’t really matter if you get 2y no matter what: there’s no more after your 2y, but i think that’d lead to leaders doing a bunch of the “fuck it” last term stuff because they have no reason to make a good impression for their potential reelection






  • yeah i completely agree with that part… just i think in terms of costs i wanted to know for real if its a good argument, and figured id document it

    yall have some of the highest per capita healthcare costs in the world, and some of the worst health outcomes among peer economies. “too expensive” and “better quality” are both terrible arguments based on the reality of the situation (lol reality… because that matters)

    … but it’s also interesting to put into perspective: that $2b/day doesn’t even come close to healthcare costs (although… it’s not an order of magnitude off, so there’s that i guess)


  • quick estimate because i’ve seen this a few times:

    australia spends ~$279b/y on health (~$190b usd)

    australia is roughly the population of texas at 27.6m

    us population is 340m

    so all things being equal that’s $2.2t usd for the us population

    so after 6y at war you could have had 1y of healthcare

    ngl i was really hoping it’d be closer :(

    (but of course this is bullshit anyway because yall already pay for healthcare, and lives extinguished vs lives saved etc etc… thus the “all things being equal” like circular cow in a vacuum)





  • i’m not a member of a church, i’m very atheist, but also i kinda put churches around the same place as sports clubs… they’re largely non-profit entities that exist for the benefit of members… kinda like a co-op too

    i think given that - ie their mission isn’t based around making money, but providing free services - it’s fair to put them on the same level as other membership-based orgs

    all of these orgs have a “not for me” crowd, but just because it’s not for you doesn’t mean that they don’t provide services to their members in the same way that sports clubs, maker spaces, car clubs, youth clubs, etc all provide things and shouldn’t be taxed in addition to the income tax that their members already pay