I’ve never watched day9 regularly but whenever I do it’s a joy. he seems to be a great guy indeed, and afaik never has been in any kind of YouTuber/streamer drama or anything.
maybe, I mean it tracks with enlightened centrism people speaking utter nonsense while trying to sound deep and thought provoking… but it still bothers me. what does it mean to let go of the democratic party or the united states…
wtf are you talking about?
the bar is so low. did everyone forget who this guy is?
wake up calls don’t do shit when you’re not interested in “waking up”
pack the goddamn court you cowardly libs.
of course they’ll keep it up. it’ll even have extra content, like multiple currencies, battlepasses, seasons and XP boosters.
I’m sure EA will do it justice
this guy comoderated the republican primary in Colorado as well and he was incredible. didn’t take bullshit and put everyone (including and especially boebert) in their place. what a hero.
well you can’t stop people from bringing joints by making it illegal; that way only the bad guys would bring joints. instead everyone should bring joints to school because the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a joint is a good guy with a joint.
but that doesn’t contradict them
the supreme court has never been apolitical since its inception, and it never will. people hold beliefs and opinions and that makes up their political views. they don’t suddenly become empty vessels when they’re appointed to any position, lifetime or not.
i don’t get how appointing a lackey is supposed to be a bad idea. if anything, lifetime appointment makes it more important to appoint lackeys so your “rule” stays long after your term.
no, but they can surely end it sometime. a president can be corrupt but they have to fuck off after 8 years max. alito can say fuck democracy, blame his wife for it and live the rest of his life doing his best to ruin yours.
that’s my point
democracy? supreme court can call elections for you. and has. wrongly.
supreme court justices have lifetime job security to prevent corruption.
every other position in every other part of the government has term limits to prevent corruption.
edit: apparently people are having a problem with the point I’m trying to make. my point is that minimizing corruption is the supposed reasoning for term limits but also lifetime appointment, which are exact opposites.
obviously neither can prevent corruption as we can clearly see both kinds of positions hold lots of corrupt people. but at least elected officials can in theory be held accountable for their corruption in elections. supreme court justices answer to no one. for life. that’s fucked up.
to be able to run for president even if you’re convicted is a good thing.
though in lots of places in the US you can’t vote for the president. seems ridiculous that you can be one. both should be allowed.
i was being sarcastic, there are no brilliant minds and you can’t outbreed intellect; that’s not how things work. idiocracy is a reactionary movie.
When has a right-wing joke ever been funny