They also publish almost all cutting edge medical research. So what’s your point?
They also publish almost all cutting edge medical research. So what’s your point?
Yet, before the Republican National Convention. Where they are set to officially choose their presidential candidate.
Also in the faster time formats it is a valid strategy to move faster than your opponent forcing them to run out of time. Even though you might be a queen or two down. But if they can’t mate you in the time allotted, well…
You forgot the immediate shushing after the “I’m not”.
That is the “beauty” of that book. It is self-contradictory. It can and has been used to justify anything. Almost everyone reads just the bits they like and ignore the rest. Taken as a whole it is on par for what you would expect from 2 millennia old shepherds. Not some divinely inspired work of absolute truth.
Let’s Encrypt’s certbot allows you to setup a script to be run after acquiring the certificate. No cron job needed.
Humans will do what is right. After they have exhausted other possibilities.
That is to be expected with cutting edge research. Studies get retracted all the time. The vetting process is not perfect and never can be. Especially when there are bad actors gaming the system.
You could attack Lancet and Elsevier in general on other grounds. But this in my opinion is not one of them.