![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/82dfa407-705b-4319-bcd3-89a19b740ce3.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
He is also in the article, yes.
He is also in the article, yes.
I usually am pleasant, though. I would feel much less human if I just demanded things!
I don’t know, I didn’t write it!
Edit: Wait I get it, if you bracket the statements differently (so that “do not have” applies to each one instead of all of them) you get (!A && !B && !C) instead of !(A && B && C). That seems super unintuitive and I can’t believe the majority claimed that there’s no ambiguity, when I feel like they’ve chosen the much less obvious interpretation.
The losses are being distributed among society while the corporation keeps the profits. No one thinks this is actual socialism, that is the whole point of the saying.
But they haven’t found the facial database and Invenda claims they don’t have one, right? Their story is that the machine takes an image, runs some local processing to determine demographic info about the user/customer/target/victim, and then stores that instead of storing the image or biometrics.
There’s a good chance they’re lying but claiming the database has been “revealed” when no one has found it yet seems like sensationalism.
Edit: “Secret demographic database derived from facial recognition” would be true but sounds less snappy, I guess?
I did as a kid, but my tinnitus covers it up now.
I think it’s way more likely that he gets sentenced to house arrest, which he could serve at Mar a Lago. The other option is to have Secret Service agents following him around inside a prison trying to protect him from the other inmates (and possibly the guards), and I don’t think either the prisons or the Secret Service want to deal with that.
Hey, I dislike her as much as the next person, but can we please avoid attacking her appearance, using gendered insults, and calling for violence? That’s, like, not good for any of us. We can attack her policies and stances instead, the things that matter.
In the initial phase, the official fix (just purge your cache and redownload the filter lists to get the latest ones) didn’t work for me, but the second revision of a filter someone posted to Lemmy did. It had the side effect of making it impossible to scroll down on video pages, but it’s not like the comments on Youtube are super valuable most of the time anyway.
After a week or so I deleted that one to see how the official filters were doing, and it turned out they worked great and I haven’t had an issue since.
Mostly SMS, but I have one friend who uses Whatsapp. I have Signal installed but wasn’t able to convince anyone else to switch.
Why would I have my watch history turned off? I assumed that Google knows what I watched whether or not I tell them to keep that info available for me.
Like “you get a fine” illegal, or “you go to jail” illegal, or “Judge Dredd executes you in the street for possessing stimulants” illegal? If the punishment is light or the risk is low, many people probably just keep using it, like alcohol during Prohibition. If there’s a harsh punishment and the risk of actually being punished is high, there might be riots.
Mondo
I mean that’s the problem, isn’t it? What is it about these assholes like Tate that appeals to young men?
Do you know if there is a good lemmy community for discussing Kenshi? I was about to go on a huge tangent about my experience with the game and stopped myself because this comment section probably isn’t the right place. ^^;;
This is just not actually true, though? I do remember my past coworkers and who was working late and checking emails on weekends. I’m not saying they should have been, but I for sure remember them doing it.
For the better part of the 21st century, the country has suffered from an ambient rage that remains partially inexplicable and knows no racial boundary.
Inexplicable? Inexplicable‽ Has this writer looked around in the 21st century?
Jesus Christ, they’re like the villains from Captain Planet.