OpenBSD admin and ports maintainer

  • 0 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: May 29th, 2024

help-circle








  • Every piece of hardware I’ve used past 2010 or so seems to have just gotten worse and worse, I honestly think I’m cursed.

    2013 (? can’t quite remember), Sager gaming laptop with sli gpu config, gpus drew too much power for the battery (I believe), leading to black screen and reboot. Company feigned ignorance, ran unrelated tests on RMA, Socially awkward at the time and was scared to ask for a refund. Convinced to this day it was a scam.

    2015, desktop computer I built randomly powers off during usage, no errors, not the power supply, unsolved to this day.

    2020-2022 5 cheap ebay thinkpads, all with one hardware problem or another. My beloved T60p was the last to go.

    2022-present Framework laptop, ports suffer intermitent failure, webcam microphone stopped working. Replaced webcam/microphone, works for a day, breaks again. Unsolved.

    2022-preset Steam deck, had to RMA 3 times for various hardware issues, works now, but the right trigger still rubs against something but I can live with it. Spilled coffee on the left trackpad so it’s sticky; that’s my fault though so I can’t blame it on the curse.









  • I’m an OpenBSD user & ports maintainer, and while I don’t totally agree with the permissive ethos, I’ll summerize it the best I can:

    Permissive licensing (anyone can use your code for any reason, as long as they give attribution) means more people are using your software, which is improving the quality of software in the world, and regardless of it is being used for nefarious purposes or not, it increases the probability of your software becoming a standard. Copyleft/GPL can lead to total rejection of software by large proprietary/corpo entities, and lead to in-house proprietary implementations instead. A good example is MacOS, which if BSD didn’t exist with the license it did, we could have very well have ended up with with two systems as non-portable as Windows instead of one.

    My personal opinion on the matter is that your license should change depending on what type of software you’re writing. I think permissive is good for libraries and highly portable applications. For something like a game on the other hand, I think something like the GPL isn’t good enough; I would pick a license that would would prevent any commercial use whatsoever. I don’t care about the purity of open source or what does or doesn’t qualify open source or free software; I view it as zealotry, and licenses are a tool, not an ideology.


  • As much as I appreciate projects like Linux Mint improving portability for projects like GTK (against GNOME’s wishes), Linux Mint and PopOS have a similar dependency issue of being dependent on Ubuntu. To what degree each project is I don’t know, but personally I’d use something that is either entirely independent (Alpine, Void, Gentoo, Devuan, Debian, etc), or at the very least not a fork of a fork (especially in Ubuntu’s case with how many poor decisions Canonical are making in regards to proprietary repositories and telemetry).

    Devuan or Debian aren’t exactly hard to set up with a similar environment and interface to Ubuntu, and otherwise function in a very similar fashion, so if you want something like Ubuntu without the shittification, use one of those.

    EDIT: A commenter pointed out that LMDE (Linux Mint Debian Edition) also exists, which is a Debian-forked version of Linux Mint, rather than Ubuntu forked.