teft

The supreme court doesn’t have jurisdiction for state elections so how would they invalidate it?

There was no order to fire in that incident. The guardsmen opened fire because they were"scared for their lives". That narrative has been questioned because it isn’t plausible but no one ever gave an order to shoot.

Edit: I didn’t see you mentioned UNM bayonetting too but after looking at that one it seems like that also didn’t have an order to bayonet people. If you approach a soldier with a bayonet out who is there for riot control you might get stabbed. It’s not right but it’s a fact. That’s just the self defense mentality of soldiers.

It’s the main reason you shouldn’t use soldiers in policing actions because generally we are trained to kill, not to talk nicely to people. But it’s also why you train soldiers to only follow legal orders.

Tell me you’ve never been to basic without saying it.

You aren’t taught to follow any order. You’re taught to follow lawful orders. There is a big difference.

They would be using inert training rounds for this. They’re filled with concrete instead of explosives. Not as expensive as live rounds but still.

At press time, only one outlet has said it plans to sign on to the new rules announced by the Pentagon, which the Trump administration now calls the “U.S. Department of War”: pro-Trump network One America News Network (OANN).

I wouldn’t doubt this administration taking this as an opportunity to ban everyone except OANN. Nothing is below them and nothing they do will surprise me.