trevor

It’s a two-step process:

1. Misuse the word “groomer” until it means “anyone that isn’t strictly heterosexual” (while also taking away useful vocabulary to describe a real abuse tactic).
2. Make cruel and unusual punishment legal for “groomers”.

Make no mistake: they want you dead. It’s that simple.

imagine fleeing an argument you’re wrong on this way 🤡

Russia is the country imposing the invasion in Ukraine. Russia is the only country that can stop doing the invasion.

FYI: The Mises caucus is an even more far-right faction of the (fake) Libertarian party that leans pretty heavily into ethno-nationalist policies. I’d take everything this organization says with a massive grain of salt.

Midwestern democrats are actual democrats. If all democrats had their politics and approach, we’d be much better off.

No. It’s a federal district court. You just have to be a US citizen.

This needs to be plastered everywhere it can be on social media.

I hope if he has a red line for the SC, it’s actually real and unlike the fake one that Israel totally didn’t cross.

Pack that fucking court already.

If felons can’t vote (they should be able to), they sure as shit shouldn’t be able to run for office.

Funny that this info only comes out immediately after Schiff successfully crushed people that would actually represent us in the primaries.

I’m so sick of corporate dem malfeasance. Absolute demons.

Yeah. I’ve tried that, and I’ve found a couple of resources, but they never cover the “non-partisan” positions (a joke of a term). At least not in my area.

But something like you said that’s as simple as “if you’re progressive, here’s a list of names. If you’re a moderate, don’t vote :)” would be great.

I vote in every primary and general, but are there any cheat sheets for voting on these offices? For stuff like House and Senate races, it’s usually easy enough to find the candidate online and check their voting history and policy statements to see how much of a cretin they really are.

But for a lot of positions, like judges, school board, etc., you usually get a nameless face with no party affiliation and rarely anything turns up when you google them.

They legitimized the border “crisis” to average voters, and then demonstrated that Trump, who doesn’t even currently hold office and didn’t want it to pass (to make Biden look bad), was more capable of getting people to act the way that he wanted his party to.

That may have made the Republicans look petty to anyone that’s paying attention, but it had the much more negative drawback of laundering a far-right narrative and showing that the other guy actually has more command over the fake “crisis” to average voters.

Democrats need to learn that capitulating to right-wing narratives, even if doing so disingenuously to own the repugs in some 4-D chess strategy, doesn’t work.

Thanks to Biden, and other democrats hurdling the Overton window to the right by legitimizing “the border crisis” and then serving the republicans the absolutely deranged border bill that they wanted.

Thank fuck that failed to pass, but that only make democrats look weak in the face of the manufactured border “crisis”.

I won’t answer. You are not owed an answer, you snivelling genocide apologist.

As I said: you can use the lack of an answer to reflect on how effective the broader strategy of defending genocide will be to move people to vote for Biden in the general election.

This person is a pro-genocide NPC and this is where their dialogue tree starts looping.

Skill issue. Biden should simply stop enabling the genocide.

Banger comic.

You’re defending genocide, and anyone that isn’t in favor of the genocide can see that. We’re going in circles, which, I think, might be representative of the broader strategy of telling people to “suck it up, the genocide is the best we’re going to get”, so I’ll leave you to ponder that.

Thanks for confirming that you’re a proud genocide defender.

I guess we’ll see how doing nothing but defending genocide until the general elections turns out. Surely it’ll have a better outcome than acknowledging the fact that enabling genocide (and thereby, doing genocide) is not acceptable and having Biden change course on that. I’m not confident that defending genocide will win people that are anti-genocide or otherwise apathetic to voting over.