![](https://lemmy.kde.social/pictrs/image/739d585c-bc24-47b8-b895-5f48e3090d0b.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
your organs will come out
Hernia is also a possibility.
But you have to be pressing really hard and have other problems in connective tissue to have that.
your organs will come out
Hernia is also a possibility.
But you have to be pressing really hard and have other problems in connective tissue to have that.
On the contrary, it (the website) looks really nice.
The product, on the other hand, seems targeted towards “normies” and would probably do better in a place that doesn’t have ppl already self hosting their stuff.
Also ~100Mb/s is in no way the average speed in an Indian household.
You’re right. It’s not.
I also don’t see any specific mentions of india in your link up there to that random site.
I don’t see any either. Guess why. Because it only has the top 10, further emphasising the point that :
the average Indian is not doing “Hella fast Tokyo banddrifts”
And Japan has a 300+ Tb/s connection. Your point?
My point is that the average Indian is not doing “Hella fast Tokyo banddrifts” (not sure what banddrift even means, but no).
And yes, a 1Gb/s connection is theoretically available, but how many people are using the ~₹4000/month connection?
Considering how many people tend to just not have Broadband at home, relying just on mobile internet, we can see how things compare with others.
Also, to point to the tread starter, most of the “thousands of” cables that you see on poles in congested areas, are just abandoned cables from older installations which nobody cared to remove.
those wizards must be streaming some Hella fast Tokyo banddrifts with all them wires.
That part is wrong for India, at least.
Here’s a random site with some stats
India, you can expect ~100Mb/s with FTTH and 50Mb/s otherwise. Reliability is even worse.
Rest is right.
Except that OP is implying that the analogy being used doesn’t match the argument being put up.
Rereading OC, I realise that it is not really an analogy, since the same “X” is being used in both the cases. So perhaps we should be looking for something else.
An invalid analogy, perhaps?
Since the original thing is an analogy and OP is trying to say, that one cannot be used as analogous to the other.
It’s just an overly positive way of saying, “If you don’t get good grades in uni, many HRs will de-list you before looking at your resume”.