shes in the wrong party

Ending 20,000 lives is still pretty horrible. Sometimes in history there are no good guys

Have you ever heard of predictive policing? https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/07/17/1005396/predictive-policing-algorithms-racist-dismantled-machine-learning-bias-criminal-justice/

the political opinion of a famous person is worth dog crap

no?! because they have influence

hope you realize that if ur wrong, this sounds pretty dumb

I mean the part right after it, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror - most of the people killed in it werent nobles or anything like that, just ordinary people

And the solution is not to kill people who say awful things. EDIT: if ur downvoting me, say why

Because killing people is wrong and can very very easily get out of hand. Consider The Terror, which followed the French revolution - edit: clarified myself by mentioning The Terror

I think a major problem with the stock market is the lack of long term planing. And we see that clearly with what’s happened to Boeing with their planes falling apart

they didn’t have to nuke civilians but using nukes was a good idea overall

I think its like sugar, too much and it’s horrible but in moderation its fine

yeah this just means more targeted ads for me I don’t want the world knowing what I ate for breakfast and I don’t want the world knowing that I gave my friend some money this wouldn’t free anyone of anything

they could hide a crypto miner in it, if you look at the numbers for some currencies this can actually make similar kinds of cash compared to ad revenue

And what happens when the state gets controlled by someone who doesn’t like what you have to say? You go homeless?

how about weapons manufacturers?

yeah but python is super slow

what would be the alternative? if someones super rich and commits a crime, and the punishment is just a fine, it wont really affect them

sure but you wouldn’t like being told who to have kids with just make gmo babies if you want superhumans, much faster and cheaper some dude in China did it already

I think it is, but it can balance out the theft imposed by the ultra wealthy its all about the nuance of the wording ngl

the govt takes ur money - this is theft monopolies and duopolies take ur money for basic goods and services - this is theft