• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 1st, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s an interesting point that would be nice to see addressed more in anti-superhero fiction, like The Boys. They addressed this problem to some extent with the Rorschach depiction in the Watchmen TV series.

    Feels like Rick and Morty has had the same issue with people idolizing Rick. They have addressed it to some degree by showing how Rick’s bad qualities also make him miserable etc.



  • worldsayshi@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlWhats your such opinion
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    An even less popular opinion: if you care enough about climate change to not have children you should have children. The alternative is that only people who don’t care about climate change will have children.

    Anyways, the fertility rate has dropped very quickly all over the developed world and the world is turning developed quickly. I’m not saying that will solve climate change but it looks like overpopulation is at least going to be solved.






  • worldsayshi@lemmy.worldtoAntiwork@lemmy.mlI sure as hell don't.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The negative connotation that you mention is the point of the trade off. On one hand it makes the message less appealing - because it’s using a symbolic name with a negative connotation.

    On the other hand - the negative connotation makes it less likely that the symbols will be hijacked by opponents.

    By example:

    • Green movements don’t have symbols with such connotation. Opponents use green washing to hijack the movement.
    • Pirate party movements do have names and symbols with negative connotations. If you’re working with intellectual property you don’t want to be associated with piracy. There’s no such thing as pirate-washing…(?) However, open source movements is a related phenomenon and a counter example. There have been examples of open source-washing. Companies that pretend to be open but they really aren’t really. Android and openai comes to mind.

    When a movement is formed there is a possibility to build a narrative that is more or less desirable to hijack. Making it less desirable to hijack might make it less desirable overall. That’s the trade off.


  • You have a good point. Although I doubt it’s worth the trade off. I think pirate party movements vs environmental movement is a good comparison. Pirate party-ism kind of died. Environmentalism lives on. Not saying it’s necessarily because of naming. But, I don’t think sounding like you’re “pro theft” helped.