

Shitty way to act when someone drops a normal opinion. Don’t be tribalistic


Shitty way to act when someone drops a normal opinion. Don’t be tribalistic


Another skeleton in the closet

That’s magical


Assassination for thee but not for me


Weaponized tribalism


Well now… I still do think you can tell a lot about a person from how they speak of the dead, but under the circumstances this is a level of restraint I would struggle to achieve.


“Far left” is when “actually kind of try to govern”


Their voters are the former, the politicians are the latter. It’s a sick cycle of enabler abuse by authoritarian followers and cluster B sickos


He sure does seem firmly intent on creating a shortage of low-earning labour. Probably nothing to unpack there!


I’ve had good success buying second hand on eBay, but I bet you could also do worse than getting used parts off Gumtree, look for anyone selling a broken or outdated computer - or in the free section - and spend some time going through a pile of ewaste, shucking all the drives, and then running tests on them.


https://theauthoritarians.org/
The knowledge won’t delight you, but it’s easier to deal with anger and disappointment when you’re not confused.


American political parties aren’t public institutions, their inner workings are beholden to nobody but their paymasters. It’s a rotten problem so old everyone’s stopped noticing the smell


Oh right, they only bring important matters to the American people. Like snowballs brought in during climate discussions, that was sufficiently important.


In the year of our lord sweet baby Jesus fucking Christ two thousand and twenty six, how is sport your biggest political concern?


Some Russians get it. Pussy Riot and Little Big shows that much. You always wish the people living under corrupt authoritarians were more rowdy, outspoken, proactive - but there’s no such thing as a morally superior hater.


Yeah let’s just judge entire people by their elected leaders. Let’s forget about Citizens United, the bullshit voting system, gerrymandering, voter suppression, foreign influence campaigns, corrupt primaries, and the death of the fairness doctrine. You can totally judge an entire people based on their president, that’s not childish at all.
Big fat /S for those who so clearly need everything spelled out


They know. It’s a communication issue here. I am certain.
Edit: I take it back, I don’t know if anyone has common grounds with you.


I know for a fact you’d have plenty of common ground with them if you weren’t so bent on making them out to be a bad person.


Mortal Kombat announcer: FACTUALITY
We broadly agree about .ml as a whole, but not on how you’re treating this individual. You don’t convince anyone of anything this way, it makes them identify more strongly with whatever you’re attacking. That, too, is part of how we got to this ruinous moment. Prejudice, in a word.
In any case, debating fascists has always been a bad idea. Fascists are not good faith participants in any debate, and their seat at the table only ever serves to normalise their twisted views, and spoil any chance at the healthy interplay of competing ideas.