• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    No, you responded by putting words in my mouth and then I clarified. You followed up with blatantly miscontruing what I said in the clarification, which is consistent with your first post.

    Go ahead and get the last word in. I’m sure you will make something up and proclaim you won.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, you responded by putting words in my mouth and then I clarified. You followed up with blatantly miscontruing what I said in the clarification, which is consistent with your first post.

      Your clarification was equally suspect or incomplete. I tried to expand your incomplete definition to point out that not only to charitable organizations exist that perform work outside the basics of the first level of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and that government should not be the only arbiter of which causes should receive funding which is what you’re proposing. You ignore that and refocused on basic healthcare treatment, which is just a fraction of what charitable donations go to, yes beyond just cancer treatment, which was your argument.

      Go ahead and get the last word in. I’m sure you will make something up and proclaim you won.

      How do you know I didn’t already do what you’re accusing me of? You stop reading posts the first moment when you find something upsetting to you.