Speaks for itself. We’ve been beyond satire for a long time but this one still got me.

    • galoisghost@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      The should just be honest:

      “Yes this is bad, but we might want to use this power ourselves so we won’t do anything to reverse it. You just need to vote so only WE have the power to use it.”

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Kill or forcibly resign everyone on the Supreme court who voted in favor of the decision, appoint new justices, and have it overturned.

          More realistically? Add more members to the Court so they’re the majority and then overturn it.

      • araneae@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        99% of democracies give up right before hitting it big and concentrating supreme power in the hands of a benevolent dictator.

        Examine this change of logic. The democrats want a mandate from the people before they act antidemocratically? So that they can maintain the highground when they do an inherently lowdown thing? And they could do it now but they want a blue election first? Are you a snake eating its own tail?