TL;DR

Generally, the practical way to identify if a product is ultra-processed is to check to see if its list of ingredients contains at least one item characteristic of the ultra-processed food group, which is to say, either food substances never or rarely used in kitchens, or classes of additives whose function is to make the final product palatable or more appealing (‘cosmetic additives’).

Food substances not used in kitchens appear in the beginning or in the middle of the lists of ingredients of ultra-processed foods. These include hydrolysed proteins, soya protein isolate, gluten, casein, whey protein, ‘mechanically separated meat’, fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, ‘fruit juice concentrate’, invert sugar, maltodextrin, dextrose, lactose, soluble or insoluble fibre, hydrogenated or interesterified oil; and also other sources of protein, carbohydrate or fat which are neither foods from NOVA group 1 or group 3, nor culinary ingredients from NOVA group 2. The presence in the list of ingredients of one or more of these food substances identifies a product as ultra-processed.

Cosmetic additives are at the end of lists of ingredients of ultra-processed foods, together with other additives. As said above, cosmetic additives include flavours, flavour enhancers, colours, emulsifiers, emulsifying salts, sweeteners, thickeners, and anti-foaming, bulking, carbonating, foaming, gelling and glazing agents. The presence in the list of ingredients of one or more additives that belong to these classes of additives also identifies a product as ultra-processed.

Although information in ingredients labels is not fully standardized in all countries, some of the most frequently used cosmetic additives such as flavours, flavour enhancers, colours and emulsifiers are usually easy to identify in ingredients lists. They are often expressed as a class, such as flavourings or natural flavours or artificial flavours; or their names are followed by their class, such as ‘monosodium glutamate (flavour enhancer)’, or ‘caramel colour’, or ‘soya lecithin as emulsifier’. Other cosmetic additives may be known to consumers, such as certain types of sweeteners like aspartame, cyclamate or compounds derived from stevia. In any case, the UN Codex Alimentarius provides a regularly updated list of additives with their functional classes as well as an online search facility where both names and classes of additives can be browsed.

    • pbjamm@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      King of Flavor sits proudly in my spice rack with all its other savory, salty, smelly siblings.

    • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      For a better reference than just single ingredients, the article lists what it considers ultra processed:

      Ultra-processed foods include carbonated soft drinks; sweet or savoury packaged snacks; chocolate, candies (confectionery); ice cream; mass-produced packaged breads and buns; margarines and other spreads; cookies (biscuits), pastries, cakes and cake mixes; breakfast ‘cereals’; pre-prepared pies and pasta and pizza dishes; poultry and fish ‘nuggets’ and ‘sticks’, sausages, burgers, hot dogs and other reconstituted meat products; powdered and packaged ‘instant’ soups, noodles and desserts; and many other products see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table 1).

      The supplementary material they mention is linked later on, but the link does not work for me

      To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018003762

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        that’s helpful, thank you.

        I guess a real question is whether there is anything actually bad about being ultra-processed, and what non-arbitrarily determines what is ultra-processed and thus bad?

        • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think there is consensus that processed foods are not as good for you as food in their base form. They tend to have more calories from sugar and the like. It is not that they are inherently bad, but that people eat too many of them, thus getting most of their calories from sugar instead of other macros. This study is older, but has better definitions:

          https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/3/e009892

          • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            that makes sense, especially as sugar is not particularly filling and refined carbs are less filling as well - so it’s easier to accidentally eat too much

            Still, the focus then would be on the metabolic impact and how refined the food is, theoretically something could be ultra-processed and not have too much sugar. Seems like the wrong kind of categorization, if that makes sense.

            • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              23 hours ago

              I am by no means an expert, but I think the idea boils down to, as long as you have them in moderation, you’re fine. The issue arises when people can’t afford or don’t have access to non-processed foods (food deserts for example). It is a deep, complex, and nuanced subject, and I don’t think a single article that boils down to “ultra-processed foods bad” is really interested in the nuance.

              • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                ah yeah, good points - I’m just always wary of the way health fads misrepresent problems, e.g. organic foods being somehow a part of the solution for climate change, etc.

                • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  For sure! And this article seems to be hinting at ultra-processed foods being a huge problem, when the actual problem is probably late stage capitalism and the poverty it creates (to be less than nuanced myself, lol).

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You should only be using those substitutes while you’re still getting used to a vegan diet. Treat them like training wheels on a bicycle that need to be taken off and replaced with a proper balance(d diet) once you’re feeling secure.

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It sorta went the opposite for me, when I first started with a vegan diet I abstained from all substitutes and eventually I learned to use them to recreate foods I thought I wouldn’t be able to eat again.