kinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 3 days agoWhy are the Democrats so spineless?www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1415arrow-down115
arrow-up1400arrow-down1external-linkWhy are the Democrats so spineless?www.theguardian.comkinther@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-squareshoulderoforion@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down36·3 days agowell, no, not a coup, a constitutional crisis, but not a coup
minus-squarePangoat@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoUnlawful seizure of power is a coup . . . oh . . . wait . . . Trump has complete immunity . . . nevermind
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up82·3 days agoIt’s not a coup unless it’s from the Potomac Valley region of the US. Otherwise, it’s just a sparkling crisis.
minus-squareBigFig@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agoEh more bud light than four loko
minus-squareblackbelt352@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·3 days agoIt’s a distinction without a difference. It’s an unlawful seizure of power.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 days agoIdk man I’d say it falls under the definition of coup. With extra steps sure, still a coup tho imo
well, no, not a coup, a constitutional crisis, but not a coup
Unlawful seizure of power is a coup . . . oh . . . wait . . . Trump has complete immunity . . . nevermind
It’s not a coup unless it’s from the Potomac Valley region of the US. Otherwise, it’s just a sparkling crisis.
The Four Loko of coups
Eh more bud light than four loko
It’s a distinction without a difference. It’s an unlawful seizure of power.
Idk man I’d say it falls under the definition of coup. With extra steps sure, still a coup tho imo