Summary

Donald Trump fired FTC Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, the agency’s only Democrats, prompting accusations of illegal action.

Both cited Supreme Court precedent protecting FTC commissioners from dismissal without cause. Bedoya warned Trump wants the FTC to serve corporate interests, while Slaughter said the administration fears accountability.

The 1935 Supreme Court ruling bars presidents from removing FTC commissioners arbitrarily.

Critics say the move undermines regulatory independence and eliminates opposition voices that could challenge Trump’s policies favoring major corporations.

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    9 hours ago

    so, two rational conclusions here:

    if he illegally fired you, you were not fired. show up to your job, sue when they don’t pay you.

    OR

    laws are bullshit. grab a gun and find a nazi to point it at.

    • silverlose@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      100%!

      I’ve been thinking about this a lot recently.

      What you say is completely constitutional, but not legal. Laws are only here to maintain control, the constitution is more abstract.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I really don’t vibe with the constitution being special. it’s just some shit some assholes agreed on 250 years ago. doesn’t even fully prohibit slavery.

        • silverlose@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Honestly, that’s fair. AFAIK the founding fathers were mostly capitalists and they made the rules to protect themselves.

          That said, I think in the timeline of human history, we’re converging towards better governance and I think the US constitution is largely a step in the right direction.

          But also it’s more abstract and if you look at it, it’s not that bad.

          I’m not American thought.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The point is, if you break the law you will get the whole slew of consequences, if they do it they will get jack shit.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                so laws are bullshit, and it’s just a man pointing a gun at you.

                it’s just whatever he wants; the rhetoric of noncompliance with written laws is just an excuse to get people to not help and overwhelm the fucker.

              • silverlose@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I know.

                Edit: Oh you’re the op of this comment. I think we’re in agreement