• GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      33·
      4 months ago

      You mean like how you go around telling people they don’t blame Republicans if they point out something Democrats do?

      I’m not telling you who you are, you are telling me who you are. Tell me how my hypothetical is not appropriate?

      That’s not how debating works. You don’t take my analogy and say “that’s meritless.” You prove it to be meritless.

      See let me spell it out for you like it’s a standardized test.

      In my analogy:

      Burglar :: Republican

      Cops :: Democrats

      Dog :: My trust

      Shooting :: voting against my interest

      Is that clearer for you?

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          12·
          4 months ago

          Reasoning was provided, you seem to be incapable of processing analogies and reasoning. You just did the same thing again. Why is it meritless? Because it’s meritless. You have none of the requirements necessary to even hold a discussion. All you do is circular nonsense.

          Here, let me ask you a very simple question and go from there.

          What is the job of a congressmen? In the simplest terms you can think of.

            • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
              12·
              4 months ago

              Yeah, that’s about what I expected. Discussion and understanding between two parties is a two way street. You’ve provided vague refutations with no specifics. Claimed assumptions without stating what those are. I don’t even know what point you’re trying to make aside from telling people they are wrong for feeling a certain way about something.