The GOP want to provoke an emotion response with shit like this because they think it justifies their emotive support of trump and the people like him. We are all emotional beings, so when they provoke us, like they have when making attacks on the judiciary, they can point to us and say, “they’re emotive too.” It’s manipulation and I don’t believe much of this engagement is genuine.
The point is, it’s more important, for people like Abrego Garcia, that we are not emotive right now and show a unified front of being principled. If a judge in New Mexico has to take an L then they have to take the L.
That judge has the choice to lay down her judgeship, plead her case in the court of public opinion and I would support her. If she’s doesn’t then she must obey the laws that bind us all. If she has done that then she has to go through courts.
No one’s stopping you from talking, and votes don’t matter. I think most people have the numbers turned off anyway.
Say what you’re going to say.
EDIT: should have kept scrolling before commenting. I saw your other comment.
I said my peace.
The GOP want to provoke an emotion response with shit like this because they think it justifies their emotive support of trump and the people like him. We are all emotional beings, so when they provoke us, like they have when making attacks on the judiciary, they can point to us and say, “they’re emotive too.” It’s manipulation and I don’t believe much of this engagement is genuine.
The point is, it’s more important, for people like Abrego Garcia, that we are not emotive right now and show a unified front of being principled. If a judge in New Mexico has to take an L then they have to take the L.
That judge has the choice to lay down her judgeship, plead her case in the court of public opinion and I would support her. If she’s doesn’t then she must obey the laws that bind us all. If she has done that then she has to go through courts.