• Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This seems reasonable to me?

    If you’re running it that way you still can, they’re just not going to accept bug reports or have end user docs anymore. All the developer docs will still cover it.

    It’s an open source project and they need to focus their energy on known good configs.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s reasonable for an engineering standpoint. Bummer for people who don’t want to run HASSIOS or install HA on an already provisioned system without having to fuck with docker.

      • bw42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, easiest way to turn me off a project is pushing black box installers. Don’t trust software that tries hiding what its doing.

        • ftbd@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          What turns me off is software that insists on running with unreasonable privileges. Rootless podman containers are the way to go – you can decide the privileges of the user account running the container, and the container image is inspectable (and tweakable if you find something you don’t like). And for the devs, maintaining (just) a container image is way less overhead than managing distribution-specific packages for 5 different package managers and dozens of distributions