• HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      You either don’t understand what tactics mean or you have some really Pepe Silvia shit to share with me.

            • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Tactically, it meant I reduced the risk of Trump winning. Him winning doesn’t mean abstaining from voting would have achieved that end better.

              You think this is some kind of gotcha, but you are still just demonstrating a lack of understanding of what tactic’s mean. You can make tactically sound actions and still lose you fucking idiot.

              • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s not a “gotcha”. If your goal was to vote out trump, you failed. That tactic did not work. How you evaluate that as tactically sound, I’m not sure.

                Furthermore, I think your tactic leaves you in a strategically untenable situation.

          • Wakmrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well there’s the same amount of genocide. But yes, we agree, and that means voting this way was a tactical and strategic failure.

        • Arcadeep@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ah yes, because giving Trump the win instead has ended genocide and improved the lives of millions