Sperm without an egg is not viable. That’s my point. Your sperm alone will not produce a living child. An egg that was lost in a period would not have produced a living child on its own either. What’s there to not understand? I get that you are referring to its potential to fertilize but this takes a string of good and valid arguments too far and to the absurd.
(Btw fertilizing an egg is a group effort and takes multiple sperm)
Sperm without an egg is not viable. That’s my point. Your sperm alone will not produce a living child. An egg that was lost in a period would not have produced a living child on its own either. What’s there to not understand? I get that you are referring to its potential to fertilize but this takes a string of good and valid arguments too far and to the absurd.
(Btw fertilizing an egg is a group effort and takes multiple sperm)
deleted by creator
You can repeat it all you want, that doesn’t make it more true
You have incredible projection and insecurity issues.