Hackers have forced the temperature of many French supermarket fridges up to 50C overnight, in an “unprecedented” cyber-attack affecting several hundred stores across the country, with fires and food losses reported.

The Paris prosecutor’s office said on Monday ⁠the large-scale attack was “affecting connected refrigerators ⁠in several ​major food retailers across France”. Reported damage included “food losses and fires”, it added.

The prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, instructed France’s national cybersecurity agency ANSSI to investigate, ⁠a person in his office said.

France “was coordinating with its European counterparts, as other countries may also be affected”, while also investigating whether any other French ⁠firms were at risk, they said.

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I read some freezers went way past that and heated up to 80°C.

    That seems enough to actually cook most of the stuff.

  • what@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It seems like shooting themselves in the foot if the hackers don’t have anywhere to buy food from

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Username was admin, password automatically changed to the current date. Not so much a hack as bad cybersecurity. They were warned not expose the management interface to the internet. Vendor did a bad job, left the key under the mat.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Remote monitoring for equipment health. A data logger for maintenance is reasonable.

      Why they would have anything other than local control over temperature is the questionable part.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, the temperature control and the remote monitored variables probably aren’t air-gapped. So if you gain access to the remote monitoring, you’re already in the system, from where you can attack the rest of the system. Ofcourse you could design the system so that there’s no link between the monitored stuff and the rest, but then you’d need extra components so there’s a financial driver not to do this if you build this kind of equipment.

        Edit: this is all assuming that the system isn’t by design remote controllable, and my guess would be that it probably is. It allows equipment builders/suppliers to help their customers with “remote troubleshooting”.

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          They should copy some ideas from the manufacturing industry. If you want to change settings, you need to be physically on site. If you just want to monitor the system, you need to use the company-provided laptop and a VPN.

          • SteevyT@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            When I was a manufacturing engineer back in 2016 I ended up on a conference call between maintenance, myself, and the manufacturing engineer that programmed the equipment 2 timezones over. I walked maintenance through the physical set up while on my couch at home, but couldnt find the position reset button in the program on my laptop for a servo drive so I called up the guy who programmed the machine to ask if he could remote in and click the button, also from home.

          • zout@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I work in manufacturing, and the trend there is that most machine suppliers will deliver a machine with it’s own PLC where the programming is walled off. They then offer you subscription based support, where they can connect remote through vpn or with a router/5G connection. You need tech-savvy managers to understand the huge risk this carries. Fortunately, lots of people are waking up in Europe due to the NIS2 directive.

            • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Ok, so the fancy new systems are even worse than I expected. I have some experience with the older ones though.

              Either those systems were never designed with the Internet in mind, or the people who installed them knew what they were doing and disabled all the unnecessary connections and features. Either way, the systems I’ve seen are probably pretty tricky to hack. I you want to change anything, you would need to be physically in the same network as the automation system itself.

              • zout@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                That’s pretty much my experience too. I also just read that the Danfoss hack involved the username admin and for the password the date of today. A company like Danfoss should really know better, even if it was never meant to be connected to the internet.

        • Hal@piefed.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          The article said the defrost cycle was trigged which is what heated the fidges to 50C (I was a bit confused at first as to how they could make them heat up past room temp).

          I can imagine use cases for remotely controlling the settings in all the fridges across your hundreds of stores, but I suspect there might be a bit more hesitancy to buy the remotely controlled fridges now.

    • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably so it can store the MAC addresses of every device near it and send them home so the manufacturer can sell that info to data brokers for fingerprinting purposes tbh

    • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      They often have pretty powerful heaters for defrosting, even your household fridge has a heating coil tucked inside somewhere: Ice takes a lot of energy to melt quickly, and refrigerators are very well insulated so once they’re heating up there’s nowhere else for the heat to go. Refrigeration (using phase change) is paradoxically much more energy efficient than electric resistance heat (which is what is usually used for defrosters, because of cost minimization) so it’s not uncommon for the defrost heater to be significantly more powerful than the whole refrigeration side, because the defrost heater is only intended for very occasional use to literally de-frost the coils before turning off again. In this case, it sounds like the de-frost heater was used repeatedly or indefinitely and the cooling shut off.