Democrats have all the spontaneity of the House of Windsor. Or, closer to home, they’re closer to what Republicans once were, a party that falls in line not in love.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The time for a challenger to have stepped up to Biden was before the primaries. The only ones who did lost abysmally. You and many like you could have spent your time and effort recruiting and canvassing for someone else. But you didn’t. Instead, you just complain about Biden and have the temerity to say “any faults of Biden will be because of Trump” when you didn’t do a thing to try to get anyone to primary him.

    You want to bitch and moan, not help.

    • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, anyone that wants to run in a primary against the incumbent is already going to receive less due to the “never run against them” unwritten rule. We’ve been primed to see it as a failing strategy, and anyone that tries gets shouted down because “now is not the time.”

      I’ll readily admit that some great things have been done this presidency, and Biden needs to be more vocal about that. However, his age being part of the conversation means that they’re too afraid to actually have him talk about it (it seems like).

      I dunno. I haven’t felt less excited to vote in my life, and that’s due to the pressure all around.

      “Vote or it’s fascism” is a great motivator to get out, but when it turns into a yearly thing it no longer it no longer feels like duty.

      And yes, voting to stop fascism is a good thing. What I’m getting at is that apathy is going to win until we get someone that we can actually be excited for. Another Neo-liberal win isn’t the victory that gives me high hopes for the future.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        “It’s not possible to primary Biden. Why can’t we have a candidate other than Biden?!?!”

        Easy thing to say instead of actually working to put a candidate in office.

        • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I…are you being intentionally obtuse here? My point is that “putting in the work” quickly is overshadowed by the DNC having the largest megaphone available.

          And a lot of us are working to just live. “Putting in the work” means either taking away what little time you have to decompress, or not working and instead stomping for that ideal candidate, by taking leave from work.

          And aside from that, I was pointing out the “why” of it. Stop being abrasive and actually come into a topic willing to listen and talk.

    • Diotima@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Given that the system is heavily skewed toward incumbency, your comment is a bit disingenuous. We both know that the DNC intended Biden to run. He had the advantage of thier coffers, thier PR machine, and the support of their leadership. Implying that the playing field was at all fair ignores reality.

      I do agree, though, that Biden’s many faults are his own. His most recent failure, support for ethnic cleansing and denial of aid to refugees, should have made him unelectable by the party that claims to be pro-human rights… but here we are, with him as the best of two terrible candidates.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not disingenuous at all. If you don’t want Biden to run, work to primary him. That’s how it works. The fact that almost no candidates even tried to primary him shows that people like the person I responded to didn’t want to actually do the hard work it takes. They just waited until the inevitable and then complained. So I am going to point that out when they bitch about Biden like this. If they had at least tried, there was at least a chance Biden wouldn’t be the nominee. They didn’t try.

        • Diotima@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It shows nothing of the sort.

          There was approximately a zero percent chance, statistically, that the superdelegates would vote for anyone beyond Biden. There was nearly no chance that a challenger would have been received with anything but contempt. This “logic” is the same logic both Reps and Dems use to gaslight third party challengers, too. “If you try real hard you can overcome our utter control of the debates and privileged position to win! We promise!”

          Alternately, there WAS a choice and the vast majority of Democrats are okay with a candidate who is 100% okay cutting off aid to the victims of ethnic cleansing. I prefer to hope that that isn’t the case.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            There was nearly no chance that a challenger would have been received with anything but contempt

            And that’s why President Hillary Clinton won her 2008 primary

    • Nudding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not the fault of the electorate that the democratic party has lost touch with its base.