return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 年前Democrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square121linkfedilinkarrow-up1979arrow-down120
arrow-up1959arrow-down1external-linkDemocrats who attack the rich do better in elections. The party should take noticewww.theguardian.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square121linkfedilink
minus-squareTinidril@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·2 年前“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前No, it wasn’t. I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.
That’s not supporting evidence.
“That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
Where is the evidence to the contrary? That was the original assertion.
No, it wasn’t.
I asked for evidence for a claim. You didn’t give one.