I understand I might not be asking the right person but what’s the difference between terrorism and a warning when it involves deadly force?
I understand I might not be asking the right person but what’s the difference between terrorism and a warning when it involves deadly force?
I’m confused. Did I miss understand your wording?
100 - 77 = 23; 23% < 33%
77 - 10 = 67 point lead
Admittedly the way we talk about a “point lead” is confusing and it’s always useful to look at what the real numbers are and what they actually mean.
True. But that is based in logic and the assumption that laws follow strict “rules” and well…
I think you got my point without getting my point.
Bidens Trump’s kryptonite. He can’t stop talking about the guy. This donald dump stuff is perfect. He needs to stay on the trail and keep Trump off message campaigning against the wrong candidate.
Not mine either but I met him once in a hotel lobby. He was very nice to the group of high schoolers and came off as a decent person but that may have just been him being good at his job.
I always felt watching that election that he was pushed to the right and out of his comfort zone by the state of his base and even though I didn’t want him to be president I felt a little sorry for him. He would have made a better president than a lot of other Republicans.
Don’t think half the comments understand what the Chromecast is…
Interested in finding out more about fcast now though.
I would hope so but I wouldn’t put money on it.
Well if the 11th is quick, Trump still appeals to SCOTUS and we’ve seen how they drag their feet for him. And even if they didn’t, the case probably wouldn’t get far.
If you’re hoping for this to affect the election at this point, I think the only thing to hope for is some bad rulings that get sensationalized as an October surprise to remind people what it was like last time he was in office.
With the current SCOTUS, appealing to 140 years of history still feels like a gamble. It feels like they’d throw out 1000 years of history and explicit wording from the Bible if it benefited Republicans.
A certain site is claiming this is proof her stance on guns doesn’t make sense
S: worlds dangerous. We should fix guns. Y’all won’t so I need bodyguards.
Bodyguards protect
Right: see you’re wrong. More guns.
🤯
“If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice”
The great senator from Cancun? There’s another storm coming our way, I assume the bags are packed.
I mean sort of. But also I’ve seen people that disagree with everything Republicans and Republican candidates say, say with a straight face “at least I didn’t vote for a Democrat” so it’s also not that complicated at the same time.
LE: What ever you think it’s worse.
Me: That’s depressing and hard to believe.
5min later
Me: oh… It is worse. FML
It’s not the maga group Biden needs to convince. Doubling down when they’re already all in doesn’t mean much.
He’s trying to win an election so it’s the various “I don’t want to vote for Biden so I’ll vote for trump or not vote” in swing states people he needs to be moving. To those people, Trump trying to go on an unhinged Twitter tirade at a debate could be persuasive. At least that’s what a lot of Dems, and according to this GOP, think is going to happen.
We believe in free speech no matter what.
Cool, I’m going to say things that challenge your authority.
We need to look at the “intentions” of the speaker. And by we I mean me.
I believe in the text of the law. We need to look no further than the meaning of the words.
The wording of this law challenges your groups hold on power.
We really need to look at the intentions of the writers of this law. And be we I mean me and by writer I mean what I would have meant.
Weird… Wonder what’s going on here
Preserve, protect, defend. Didn’t say anything about upholding or abiding by so everything’s fine, what’s the big deal? 😵💫
I guess I don’t see the difference. If you are warning someone with a gun, the warning is that they willl use the gun. Legally that might not always be “terrorism” but the effect is the same so seems like we call it what it is.