• Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    There are industrial accidents, like fossil fuel plants catching fire and/or exploding, with more casualties than every nuclear ‘disaster’ combined.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pretty sure people kill more people than any other cause combined.

      Could be wrong. Depends if you count manufactured famine and healthcare crises as part of that.

      We should get off fossil fuels, but I don’t see nuclear as a way of doing that. Solar, wind, and hydro (tidal is interesting. Micro hydro could have uses without destroying entire ecosystems.)

      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        .you just can’t get around needing consistent base load capacity. I wonder if the cost of a few GWh of batteries or complicated pumped dam/lake systems is reported in solar/wind figures to make an apples-to-apples comparison.

        maybe once we have a huge fleet of plugged in EV‘s serving as battery storage, variable sources will make sense as primary generation