• Thorry84@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For these women, the liberty of privacy means that they alone should choose whether they serve as human incubators for the five months leading up to viability. It is not for a legislator, a judge, or a Commander from The Handmaid’s Tale to tell these women what to do with their bodies during this period when the fetus cannot survive outside the womb any more so than society could – or should – force them to serve as a human tissue bank or to give up a kidney for the benefit of another. Considering the compelling record evidence about the physical, mental, and emotional impact of unwanted pregnancies on the women who are forced by law to carry them to term (as well as on their other living children), the Court finds that, until the pregnancy is viable, a woman’s right to make decisions about her body and her health remains private and protected, i.e., remains her business and her business alone. When someone other than the pregnant woman is able to sustain the fetus, then – and only then – should those other voices have a say in the discussion about the decisions the pregnant woman makes concerning her body and what is growing within it

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        It is beautiful, comprehensive, and rationally emotional.

        And it will make a little ‘doink’ sound as it bounces off the hard heads of the state supreme court who, whether they say it or not, likely feel that those Commanders in Handmaid’s Tale are just a wee bit misunderstood.