• splinter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I see why you’re getting at, but I think you’re mistaken.

    Rage-bait works by evoking a reaction. It spreads because people become incensed and then feel the need to share the reason for their anger.

    This is the opposite of reaction. It is a calm response to the OP explaining why they are reacting to rage-bait and inviting them to reconsider their posting.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      i see your point too, but i also think you’re mistaken.

      engaging is any time of interaction whatsoever. i could go to a ragebait and go into the comments and calmly and politely explain xyz. But

      a) in social media sites where algorithms are used the post I’m commenting on will be more likely to show up on other people’s screens. because social media sites want engagement- doesn’t have to be positive and

      b) even in social media sites where there is no algorithm (like the one we’re speaking on) people are more likely to click on a comment section the larger the number of comments are. no point in clicking on the comment section if there’s 0 or 1 comments. every comment is an indirect increase to the visibility and probability of engagement with future users

      while I do agree with you that there are different levels of engagement- either way you are engaging.