Esquiretheduke@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square84linkfedilinkarrow-up1276arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1271arrow-down1external-linkWhy the White House is behind a rare Supreme Court push to limit gun ownershiptheweek.comEsquiretheduke@lemmy.esquiretheduke.nohost.me to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square84linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareacchariya@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoAnd don’t even think about screwing something on the end of the barrel to make it less damaging to your hearing, that is gangster shit that needs heavy regulation
minus-squareIthral@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoIIRC, the suppressor thing was to try to curb poaching during the great depression.
minus-squareBgugi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThe funny thing is that’s only a guess. They didn’t actually discuss silencers at all when they were passing the law.
And don’t even think about screwing something on the end of the barrel to make it less damaging to your hearing, that is gangster shit that needs heavy regulation
IIRC, the suppressor thing was to try to curb poaching during the great depression.
The funny thing is that’s only a guess. They didn’t actually discuss silencers at all when they were passing the law.