• bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    Given that “productive” in this case means stripping away freedoms and paving the way for an autocracy run by the worst people in the world for a rich oligarchy; along with the usual and more bipartisan production efforts of harvesting borrowed money from the federal government for their pals; this is the best case scenario.

    The last thing we want is for these traitors to be productive.

    I do wonder though, congress’ approval rating has been even lower than the presidents’ for at least a decade now, I wonder if prez finally is less popular than even them. Let me check…

    Not even close: ‘Presidential approval: 38%: Congressional approval: 24%: Direction of country: 30%: Generic congressional vote: +8 Democrats.’ From Ballotpedia on the search page.

  • deeprlyeh@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Not doing their job was their job. Not opposing Trump was helping Trump. The safest way to sabotage something is to not help when you can.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If the Republicans get stomped in the midterms they’ll get productive on fucking things up in the time they have left before the changeover.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      I feared that in 2020 and instead they put all of their energy into stealing the election they lost. Silver lining. Not that it changed anything given dems suck so hard but still.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Shocking that the people saying the government doesn’t work didn’t do any work when they became the government. Who could have seen that coming? They’re just executing their plan to “starve the beast”. By reducing its funding until it’s so ineffective that they can claim it doesn’t work then privatize and make money from the services all while providing a worse service.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah the same dimwits apparently really thought “doge” was going to be able to trim the fat or something. Or at least pretended to believe so that doge could further monkey wrench things, do a fucking terrible job, make government function worse, and then proclaim that as further “evidence” of their stupid ideas about “big government”.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        DOGE had two points. Number one was to gut all the agencies that were investigating Elon so hard that they would have to drop them. Number two was for Elon to extract as much data as he could. It was a smashing success for the South African.

      • DjangoFett@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        When the military budget wasn’t the top line item it was clearly and indisputably bullshit.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, first order of business (besides stealing data and giving back-door access to Elon and probably Russians and who the hell knows who else) was to:

          …kill millions, many of them children, by cutting USAID. Probably one of the best soft power programs we had, besides the obvious benefit of saving lives.

          It was not even treated remotely seriously when you see that they sent in teenagers to “fix” the government. I mean, what even the fuck.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      With some notable exceptions, Massey, Greene. Uh, is that it? Shit, that was a short list on their side but I’m forgetting at least one, I hope.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, all those stupid conservatives that control Congress believe in unitary executive theory, and then some. They probably view things like Congress and SCOTUS as window dressing, hate democracy as a general rule, and pine for a authoritarian ruler.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Not so!

    The republican congressmen told more lies, sucked more trump butthole, committed insider trading felony after insider trading felony, and fleeced America for more tax dollars THAN EVER BEFORE IN ALL OF AMERICAN HISTORY.

    That’s probably not your definition of “productive” though, is it?

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    There’s always a parliamentarian or a “blue slip rule” to help the Democrats steal defeat out of the jaws of victory

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean given that the article has a graph clearly showing a trend of Congress’s declining productivity over time, the short answer is literally “yes.” The slightly longer answer is “yes because of the filibuster.” You could also add “executive overreach” if you’re feeling brave.