He and Abdul El-Sayed are showcasing the kind of aggressive spirit Democrats need to adopt in the new Congress.
Victory speeches from winning candidates usually follow a similar script: Thank the family, staff and volunteers; riff on how inspiring the campaign was; remind people of the hard work ahead; and extend good wishes to the defeated rival, in the spirit of generosity.
But not all Democratic winners did that on Tuesday night. In Michigan, Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed was not going to let bygones be bygones. Addressing his opponent, Mike Rogers, he said, “So, Mike, enjoy your retirement. I know you got a house in Florida and two yachts. See, you chose hate, and Michigan chose hope. May we never have to see the likes of you in this state again.”
El-Sayed wasn’t done. He moved on to Vice President JD Vance, who had described the Democrat as a “psychopath” and “very, very evil.”
“Habibi,” El-Sayed said with a smile, using an Arabic term of endearment. “There is this delicious irony in the fact that you’re constitutionally obligated to swear me in in January.”
Down in Georgia, Sen. Jon Ossoff didn’t even bother mentioning his opponent, Rep. Mike Collins — though he did say that “the American people have rebuked the depravity, corruption and incompetence of the failed lame-duck president, Donald J. Trump.”
AIPAC actively opposes him.
He supports defense, not offense. And not offensive weapons sales, or the war in Gaza. He’s also against the illegal settlements.
He wants to cut sales of bulldozers and arms to Israel, with the exception of things like defensive weapons systems that shoot down in-bound missiles.
That all sounds like perfunctionary opposal to be fair.
Would you give or sell defensive weapons to Nazi Germany? The bill do not even block all offensive weapons just specific ones . What actually actions not empty rhetoric did he push to stop the colonies in the West Bank. He is also backed by a smarter Israeli lobby called J-Streets
Basically he’s supporting anything that stops Israel and Hamas / Iran from being able to effectively attack each other. He wants to cut off their ability to get offensive munitions, and he wants to cut off the ability for any offensive munitions to be effective.
Defending Israel from any consequences is what allows them to continue their genocide.
So you are one of those who both side the occupiers and occupied ? Would you have talked about how both the slaves and slave owners was bad after Nat Turner revolt?
I am asking about concrete actions that he back to stop the colonies building and you are answering with vague words that are meanless and both side thr conflict
Block the bomb act do not end all offensive weapons either. With what they would be allowed they can finish the genocide since most of the infrastructure is destroyed and also israel block food at will to kill palestinians
Also answer the question would you give nazi Germany or Russia defensive weapons
I’m more in the camp of someone like AOC. No aid at all if they’re continuing to be aggressor. Defensive aid can’t be unconditional.
That said, a large portion of my family is Jewish, and I know a lot of people who simultaneously want to protect family and friends over there, while also wanting to halt the genocide, apartheid, and authoritarianism over there.
I don’t know if you can do the latter while still having unconditional iron dome defense aid. If defense isn’t free, then they have less money to dump into offense.
That said, I’d rather elect politicians who agree on the problem and have disagreements on the solution. We’ve had years of politicians that were too afraid to acknowledge the state as aggressor.
Many Germans wanted their family safe from the allies bombing which many of them was literally attack targeting civilians that make Hamas atrocities during October 7 like just a slap to someone else face . With your logic you would be ok with Nazi Germany getting defensive weapons or Russia buying defensive weapons for any country. There was also Germans during Nazi Germany who wanted the holocaust to end and was powerless, at least Israelis have fair elections yet they still vote for genocide…
You know what is better than letting them spend on defensive weapons? Imposing sanctions and a blockade to prohibit Israel from acquiring the material necessary to maintain the colonization .
The hypocrite you are defending here is lying and is allowing Israel to continue genocide. I bet you that if you ask 99.9% of the democrats about the form of the two state solution they will tell you Palestinians will not have the right to an army to defend itself which is an right under international laws and wouldn’t even have full sovereignty on the land like it is already to case with Oslo accords
The J Street that supports a two state solution?
You are that naive? Politicians and lobbies been lying about it for decades.
One of those huh?
I have been hearing about the two state bs for my entire life while israel is allowed to ethnically cleansing palestinians