Given the current state of partisan polarization, it’s unlikely Biden can get majority job approval next year even with the most fortunate set of circumstances. But the good news for him is that he probably doesn’t have to. Job-approval ratings are crucial indicators in a normal presidential reelection cycle that is basically a referendum on the incumbent’s record. Assuming Trump is the Republican nominee, 2024 will not be a normal reelection cycle for three reasons.

  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    From what I’ve heard and seen, there’s a massive astroturfing effort to discredit Biden over the actions of an allied nation. It’s as if a massive propaganda machine is at work that completely ignores the fact that Republicans would have an even worse stance than Biden on this issue.

    • bhmnscmm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The “but it could be much worse” argument doesn’t carry much weight for many people on this issue.

      • Decoy321@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Which is still an ignorant take, because we’ve only got two realistic options. Bad and worse.

        Any complaints otherwise are ignorant at best, if not maliciously deceptive.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Which is still an ignorant take, because we’ve only got two realistic options. Bad and worse.

          The solution isn’t “shut up and be grateful we’re not worse”. It’s actually running someone that’s good.

          We’ve tried the “shut up you don’t have a choice” strategy and that just keeps ending up with republicans in office.

          Why not just run good candidates that want to help America if they get in office?

          • chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why not just run good candidates that want to help America if they get in office?

            Because that doesn’t make nearly as much money donations as “Look at how awful the Republicans are.”

            If the D’s ran a real candidate that actually cared about the country, they’d get blasted in fund raising…People like Booker would go broke overnight if we got universal healthcare. Pelosi would lose her ass if we outlawed congressional trading.

            We’re fucked…irrevocably completely and utterly fucked.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Has anyone tried explaining that if you allow in the people literally trying to take their rights away, they won’t get another chance to vote in a politician against genocide?

        Like the genocide is awful but it shouldn’t make people forget they have very close to home issues currently happening right now.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I hear that excuse every single election and have always found it lacking.

          If we always have to wait until after the next election to demand better of the Democrats then we’ll never see any change. “Lesser evilism” will only allow the Democrats to continue sliding the overton window to the right.

          Even if you’re already planning to vote a straight Democrat ticket, don’t tell them that. Make them think you’re a swing voter they need to pander to.

          • AnonTwo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            How are you hearing it every single election? The main issues didn’t start popping up (or at least blatantly enough to change voter turnout) until the 2016 election.

            Like that’s not nearly enough elections in between to hear the excuse every election.

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                I don’t particularly care about the democratic party threat, I care about the uptick in voting issues, the supreme court, and…you know…that the opposing party is trying to vote in someone who attempted to not give up the office

                So you know, the recent ones that a lot of people started voting in about.

                If you truly believe that’s nothing new, i’ll just consider you to be part of that astroturfing described above and ask you to stop wasting my time. Seriously…

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’m not going to compromise my principles out of fear. I’d rather write in “none of the above” than hitch my wagon to a party that gets campaign donations from corporate bombmakers like Raytheon.

                  If the Democrats want my vote, they should start acting like it. They need to stop pretending they can coast to victory on “lesser evilism” before they end up repeating all their mistakes from 2016, and the threat of withholding my vote is the only leverage I have.

                  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Stop bullshitting. You’ll sit on your morals while a dictator takes over, just being happy you didn’t “compromise your morals.”

                    Which ultimately just means doing nothing while the dictator takes over.