jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 3 months agoGavin Newsom’s office pays famed photographer $200,000 a yearwww.politico.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down17
arrow-up127arrow-down1external-linkGavin Newsom’s office pays famed photographer $200,000 a yearwww.politico.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squarejonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 months agoThe question is more, why is the taxpayer paying for glamour shots that will just end up being used in his future campaigns? At least use campaign funds instead of tax payer money.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoAs I said in the other comment, the author should have probably made that the angle instead. Naming and shaming is just and only that.
The question is more, why is the taxpayer paying for glamour shots that will just end up being used in his future campaigns? At least use campaign funds instead of tax payer money.
As I said in the other comment, the author should have probably made that the angle instead. Naming and shaming is just and only that.