• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Almost as though these interviews and debates don’t really matter. They’re just fuel for a barrage of bot-powered social media spam and talk radio/podcast spin.

    My father-in-law will periodically pop in to hang out. He listens to right-wing radio and has friends who are hooked on it, and he will ask these very bizarre pointed questions about why Harris/Biden are doing XYZ. And all I can respond with is “They’re not doing that. That’s totally manufactured. Here’s proof.” He’ll acknowledge it. But then he’ll come back a week later with another nonsense allegation.

    I want to say “Just Google this shit before you ask”, but then I Google it myself and find a wall of right-wing hysterical talking points based on how my father-in-law phrased the question.

    • TOModera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I appreciate you posting that. My late ex fil did the same thing. Had a total conspiracy minded friend. Was always awkward I had to be the one to say “No, Trudeau didn’t do that.”

      At least he was nice and respectful about it. My cousins on the other hand… well, I get very high at family gatherings now.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The best way to counter such stuff - instead of disagreeing right away and making their defenses pop up, just ask them where the facts are for the claim. If they say it’s something they heard or read, ask where those sources got their info. Letting them dig further helps to show how valid or invalid what they say might be, it might plant a bit of doubt for the next time they run across something that is designed to be accepted without evidence. Maybe. I mean, that’s all we can do really, help them be more critical thinking, even if by accident.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Letting them dig further helps to show how valid or invalid what they say might be

          The problem with this approach is that it requires critical thinking.

          If they “see it on the internet on Jimbo’s blog” they believe that is equally believable to “its posted on nasa.gov”. I attribute some of this to technology getting really good at some things that it makes those that don’t know how technology works that other unbelievable things are also real.