• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    I mean, this has been a known issue since the 70s and the case of David Reimer:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer

    Born in '65, he lost his penis in a circumcision error. Parents and doctors were like “Oh, just remove it, he’s too young to know the difference, raise him as a girl, it will be fine…”

    Kid grew up with major mental health issues “knowing” they were “really” a boy. Took decades of therapy to work out. He ended up killing himself at the age of 38.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This is so important. Even if Trump comes in and wrecks everything, the work is there, and the work will become less memory holed because of the prominence of the people presenting it. The information is already out there, and there will be those who will preserve it until their last breath to ensure it’s not forgotten.

    We’ve got to stop allowing people to pretend that biology is in any way binary and this kind of important work helps that happen.

    Anyway yeah this is pretty huge and honestly a bit unexpected. Admiral Rachel Levine, MD kicks so much ass for this.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      I still hear MAGA reference the boxing match where “a man hit a woman” when in fact both failed gender eligibility tests due to abnormal physiology, not gender reassignment.

    • Letme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      35 minutes ago

      Biology is not binary? Social construct is not binary, I get that, but reproduction pretty much gates biology as binary (in mammals anyways)

      Edit: the key word being BIOLOGY. Gonads vs Ovaries.

      I understand that some people have both or none, I am not claiming that intersex people don’t exist. But good luck reproducing a mammel without a gonads and an ovary, a binary system.

      Geesh, take a biology class people

        • angcohen@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Bingo. It’s a massive clusterfuck of chemicals. Maybe if this topic was taught more often we wouldn’t be having this conversation so much.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 hour ago

            And 1 in 4500 births have atypical genitalia.

            In the US, in 2023, there were about 3.6 million births. That means that ~800 babies were born this way that year. There’s probably 50,000 people in the US right now who were born with atypical genitalia.

        • Letme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I get you point, but biological sex is either male, female, or a combination of male and female. I see your perspective that there are three options. But something like testicle vs ovaries is binary, with the option to have both, or none I guess.

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 minutes ago

            See, I think you may just need a dictionary. Binary means there is one or the other, there is no “both or neither” option. If you have more than a forced “either/or” choice, then by definition it’s not binary.

            True, false, and neither isn’t binary by any definition you’ll find in any dictionary.

          • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 minutes ago

            You’re so close.

            You just listed four options, but still argue that’s a ‘binary’. Every time you look closer, you’re going to find another outlier to categorize. Eventually, it starts to make more sense to look at it as a spectrum instead of a rigid set of ‘either A or B or AB or {NULL} or …’

          • Carnelian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            So, no, definitionally that is not binary. Can’t have four options in a binary.

            What you’re describing is actually a bimodal distribution. This is when the data congregates strongly around two peaks, but there are also many entries along a spectrum between them

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Not trying to come out swinging here, but do you know what intersex is?

        • Letme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I guess it’s what used to be call hermaphrodite? I didn’t realize that they could reproduce, but apparently they can.

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            Why do they need to be able to reproduce for their sex to count?

            They keep happening, even if they don’t have children. It’s just a fairly common mutation.

            There are plenty of genetic conditions that aren’t hereditary. Like Down’s Syndrome for instance.

      • ziproot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 minutes ago

        I’m pretty sure that when OP said “biology is not binary” they meant “biology does not mean that you are either 100% male or 100% female” (true) as opposed to “people with Z chromosomes exist” (false)

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        Tells people to take a biology class.

        Doesn’t know that “gonads” refer to the reproductive glands of both male and female organisms.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        So uh, I want to put this in perspective.

        What you said is like if you just took an algebra 1A class in high school and said there are no curved lines because you’ve only done linear equations.

        Just because your introduction into an extremely broad subject matter did not go into other details to not mean they do not exist. Especially in science, holy hell do we dumb down SO much in science to teach it.

        But please, don’t be discouraged, people are wrong all the time, it’s cool. Just learn from it.

        • Letme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          52 minutes ago

          Just to be clear, I never said that intersex people don’t exist. My perspective is that intersex people are a combination of male and female. Gonads vs ovaries. Xx vs xy chromizones. Male vs female biological anatomy (boobs vs penis etc). It’s a binary system with some mixing in between.

          Not intended to be offensive.

          Analogy: RGB is based on 3 primary colors. I am not saying that teal doesn’t exist.

          Get it?

          • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 seconds ago

            Lmao. You realize the rainbow is a SPECTRUM, right? If I show you a rainbow, can you draw the line where green stops and teal begins?

      • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It seems that way if you don’t look closely, but there are outliers that don’t fit the binary in some way or another. Around 1 in 200 people are born intersex - meaning something about their biology makes them not fit within the biological norm for their gender. For example, there are people born with a Y chromosome, but are born with only female genitalia. Some are born with both sets of genitalia (historically when this happened the parents would pick a gender and the baby would be operated on to remove the other genitals). Biology really only fits into our perfect boxes of gender until we look at the rare outliers, and see the nuance.

        This is part of the reason that Trans rights matter, because while some would have you believe that it’s all just people who were born in one box, wanting to have been born in the other box (which IMO is still a choice people should be able to make), there’s also people who genuinely, biologically don’t fit in our neat little boxes either who have just as much right to exist as those of us who do.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          55 minutes ago

          1 in 200? Do you have a source for that? Seems like a much larger number than I would have thought possible.

        • Letme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I do know that intersex people exist, obviously, but even in the explanations mammals have X vs Y chromizones, or male vs female genetalia, from a biology perspective. What is the 3rd chrmozone, or third type of genetalia? Or are chromizones a spectrum, genetalia a spectrum?

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I bet conservatives will give her kudos for doing something about curbing forced sex surgeries on babies, right?

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Nope, because in their eyes they need to enforce heteronormativity which means erasing intersex existences through forced sex surgeries on babies (you know, like they always have done).

      It’s about power, control, and enforcing their worldview on others, it’s not about truth, justice, reason, evidence, or having a fucking soul.

      • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        My stepmother is a fundamentalist Christian, and when I pressed on her black-and-white views of sex and gender she told me that intersex people exist because of sin in the world.

        Just psychopathic to think that God punishes a baby for things other people did.

        Note that I don’t see intersex as a problem aside from potential medical complications and societal pressure to conform.