• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    This story wasn’t about condemning the practice of public execution, it was about pointing out the hypocrisy of the people participating in a stoning of a woman for adultery. Was it even a public execution (that is, an event people would attend and watch)?

    Always just came off as a more vigilante justice thing so I’m not even sure it was a public execution in the way we’re referring to. Even if it were an officially adjudicated sentence, I don’t recall mention of a crowd to watch or anything. Though it has been years since I’ve read it so I dunno.

    • Evoke5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can read the whole thing in the link I sent. It was a public execution, with audience participation even.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Lol yeah no thanks. I’ll read a good book instead.

        Nothing you said changes the message of the story. He doesn’t condemn the public execution at all. He just talks people out of participating.

        There’s also that whole thing about he himself needing to be very brutally publicly executed in order to fulfill some convoluted, nonsensical plan that he himself (in the form of his own father) came up with.

        That’s like the ultimate condoning of public execution. It literally saved humanity, according to Christians.