I will say that the pbs article posted gives a better explanation- in that they are doing some of what I’m saying- it just waiving but actively ignoring penalties going forward- but that article is from undisclosed “sources” so I’ll have to wait to make final judgement.
In any case, it’s not progress when you consider how he’s gone so far to the right on every other aspect of immigration.
I’m not asking for perfect. I’m not even asking for good. I’m asking for sufficient, and on the whole, he ain’t.
On the other hand, “perfect is the enemy of progress”. While this certainly doesn’t solve the issue, it is an (admittedly minor) improvement.
It’s not even close to what’s necessary.
I will say that the pbs article posted gives a better explanation- in that they are doing some of what I’m saying- it just waiving but actively ignoring penalties going forward- but that article is from undisclosed “sources” so I’ll have to wait to make final judgement.
In any case, it’s not progress when you consider how he’s gone so far to the right on every other aspect of immigration.
I’m not asking for perfect. I’m not even asking for good. I’m asking for sufficient, and on the whole, he ain’t.