• TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Fuck yeah! UNION STRONG!

    Looking up the pay rates of these dock workers and they get paid less than I do as a Teamster.

    All the bullshit I overhear says they are all millionaires lmao. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    Pay for longshoremen is based on their years of experience. Under the ILA’s former contract with USMX, which expired on Monday, starting pay for dockworkers was $20 per hour. That rose to $24.75 per hour after two years on the job and to $31.90 after three years, topping out at $39 for workers with at least six years of service.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-much-do-dock-workers-make-longshoreman-salary/

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Maybe that’s with overtime or something. ILA top out at $39/hour.

        The contract they want would be $69/hour after three years. That’s about $144,000/year.

        I clearly should not have gone to college.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 minutes ago

            No, I think it’s better if most white-collar jobs make less than blue-collar jobs. Someone needs to line the pockets of the c-suite. That will make less people go to college and less people aspire to bullshit jobs that don’t do anything. Like the world needs another app developer, full stack developer, or middle manager. I think we’re all set with that.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s definitely going to be the overall average once you include about 4 hours of overtime

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Well, that’s something. I resent having to vote for her to prevent him. But I’ll take what I can get. Support unions!

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      86
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Except this union is unreasonable. They want a 77% increase when many make over 100k, and they want anti-technology commitments which is straight up retarded if you understand the industry at all. They rejected triple retirement contributions and a 50% increase. They are insane and holding the entire country’s economy hostage.

      • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Agreed! This UNION is so Unreasonable! All they want is a couple Hundred Million Dollars more to buy a new Jet! Sorry I was thinking of the CEO, the UNION is the Problem!

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        This guy would walk into a contract negation, see they are giving out pretzels. Sit down, anxiously waiting for a pretzel, and say, “anything you want, just let me have a pretzel already!”

      • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You think thats bad, wait until you hear about the shareholders. They dont even have to pretend to work and they’ll be paid far more for their lack of trouble. The shareholders have had well in excess of a 77% pay rise and, despite that, want even more.

        Crazy right? I bet that’s got you really annoyed, considering those are worse than the exact thing you were complaining about above…

        Right?

      • Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This attitude lack of understanding and general mindset are all that is wrong with humanity. You should be ashamed of yourself but we all know you’re not.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        80
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you can hold the entire economy hostage, you’re not getting paid enough.

        • cybermass@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          54
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah people really quick to blame essential workers.

          100k a year? What a joke. Unless you already bought, you are never gonna get a house near a major docks with that salary.

          • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            12 hours ago

            All workers really.

            When the extremely wealthy hold the economy hostage it’s the “invisible hand of the free market” and when labor holds the economy hostage they’re selfish and greedy free loaders. Really sad how that happens.

      • TipRing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A 77% increase over 6 years is 9.15% per year, which is quite good, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable.

      • vladmech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        We’re out here with the highest wealth inequality ever seen and you’re mad that a few folks actually have enough power to demand their fair share? Fuck off you 0.1% apologist.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Listen man, I’m all for news about candidates backing things but can we please start putting in * comments indicating whether or not they actually followed through with any actual progress or at least describing the situation at hand.

    We just went through a years worth of Biden pretending to care about Gaza, and 2 months of Harris also pretending to care about Gaza. And there are still people on here that are convinced the uncommitted movement is going to vote for her, or that she is actually going to change her policy, which is dangerous because its exactly the same situation that caused Hillary to lose in 2016.

    People are out here mast posting about Harris backing decriminalization of weed, yet everyone older than 30 pointed out that democrats have been promising to properly achieve that for 2 decades now, and that Harris refuses to mention her antics as state prosecutor.

    I don’t want to discount the positive here, especially because Trump would probably make a union assassination board lol, but we need to remember what actually transpires vs what a candidate claims.

    spoiler

    It only took 5 seconds for people to mention how Biden struck down the railroad union and their strike, and he stated that he doesn’t want to negotiate with collective bargaining. Harris is his VP, and therefore she extends his policy. This could easily backfire, and we could just have a repeat situation where nothing happens for several weeks, and then all of a sudden a random backroom deal materializes out of nowhere, and nothing actually gets accomplished aside from PR.