usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoTrump insults Detroit during speech … in Detroitwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square76linkfedilinkarrow-up1519arrow-down111
arrow-up1508arrow-down1external-linkTrump insults Detroit during speech … in Detroitwww.theguardian.comusernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square76linkfedilink
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoNow now, while that might seem the perfect solution, we can’t violate the Geneva convention.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThe Geneva convention doesn’t say anything about that song. So it’s all good. Right?
minus-squarebluewing@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoMeh, it’s never a war crime the first time. Go for it.
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoActually, I think it probably does specify that particular song . . .
minus-squareMegaUltraChicken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI think if you just used a 3 second clip on loop that should pass constitutional muster.
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoWell, it’s a convention and not a hard and fast rule, anyway.
deleted by creator
Now now, while that might seem the perfect solution, we can’t violate the Geneva convention.
The Geneva convention doesn’t say anything about that song. So it’s all good. Right?
Meh, it’s never a war crime the first time. Go for it.
Actually, I think it probably does specify that particular song . . .
I think if you just used a 3 second clip on loop that should pass constitutional muster.
Well, it’s a convention and not a hard and fast rule, anyway.